36. Detroit--Ann Arbor--Flint, MI CMSA; Michigan - 1,201
37. Greensboro--Winston-Salem--High Point, NC MSA; North Carolina - 1,195
38. Hickory--Morganton--Lenoir, NC MSA; North Carolina - 1,153
39. Hartford, CT MSA; Connecticut - 1,152
40. Rockford, IL MSA; Illinois - 1,190
41. Anchorage, AK MSA - 1,170
42. Las Vegas, NV--AZ MSA - 1,093
43. Amarillo, TX MSA; Texas - 1,063
44. Cleveland--Akron, OH CMSA; Ohio - 721
45. Greenville--Spartanburg--Anderson, SC MSA; South Carolina - 703
46. Oklahoma City, OK MSA; Oklahoma - 666
47. Phoenix--Mesa, AZ MSA; Arizona - 648
48. Chico--Paradise, CA MSA; California - 698
49. Madison, WI MSA; Wisconsin - 500
50. Richland--Kennewick--Pasco, WA MSA; Washington - 451
Lao Socioeconomic Census Data
The U.S. Census has released national level socioeconomic and educational 2000 census data for Lao in the United States. The following are highlights from this long-awaited data. The comparable 1990 figure is in parentheses. Data used are for “Laotian and any Combination” responses on the census form.
U.S. Lao Median Family Income 2000 - $42,445 ($23,000)
% U.S. Lao with Public Assistance Income in 2000 – 14.2% (20%)
% U.S. Lao Families Below the Poverty Level in 2000 – 17.1% (32%)
% U.S. Lao Population in Owner Occupied Housing in 2000 – 53.5% (23.0)
Industry Distribution by Percent of U.S. Lao Population (2000 Figures only)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining – 1.1
Construction – 2.1
Manufacturing – 45.1
Wholesale trade – 3.5
Retail trade – 9.1
Transportation and warehousing, and utilities – 2.8
Information – 2.1
Finance, insurance, real estate, and rental and leasing – 4.0